ACT NOW: Demand the resignation of Dr. Robert Levin from Ventura Public Health

ACT NOW: Demand the resignation of Dr. Robert Levin from Ventura Public Health

The County of Ventura was rocked last week when Dr. Levin stated that Ventura County residents whom have had contact with a Covid-19 patient or have Covid-19 will be forcibly removed from their houses in the name of "health and safety."

Watch the video clip with Dr. Levin and read the transcript!

His subsequent clarifying "apology" is not enough, because his clear threat risks setting a very dangerous precentent, and would be medical fascism! If we do not act to protect our security in our own homes, we will lose our basic rights in California... and then the rest of the country.

We'll send this Notice on your behalf to the 5 Ventura County Supervisors, AND we'll cc Dr. Levin. They need to know how serious this is!

Do not allow your freedoms to be usurped under the guise of safety. It’s time to say NO MORE! Insist that Dr. Robert Levin step down, and that Ventura County Supervisors retract their support for all "contract tracing" and anything that violates our Constitutional rights.

» BELOW IS THE NOTICE TEMPLATE WE'LL HELP YOU INSTANTLY SEND.

NOTE: Since you are sending the Notice, you are responsible to read it in full; and customize it accordingly (it's editable on Step 2) so that you are in full agreement with what you are sending.

Dear [Elected Rep's Name],

(This Notice is being sent to Ventura County Supervisors Bennett, Parks, Long, Huber, Zaragoza and the Board Clerk. CC: Dr. Robert Levin)

We, the People, of Ventura County and of all of California, demand the immediate resignation of Dr. Robert Levin from Ventura Public Health. He is clearly in breach of the “supremacy clause” and our unalienable rights. Dr. Levin has also perjured and or breached his oath of office. His words in the video embedded and transcribed here (SEE: ca-ir.org/levin-transcript/) have committed the act of Treason against the U.S. and California Constitutions. An apology for his clearly-stated threat is not enough, as his actions have caused harm to many, and they risk setting an extremely dangerous precedent.

As per the Title 18 U.S.C.A.§ 2383 Dr. Levin is to “be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.” Under what authority can he disregard State and Federal protections for the People for whom he serves? If in fact he claims he is operating under emergency orders, then he himself, as a public official loses his constitutional authority. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). For now, there is still a due process of law and Dr. Robert Levin has to be held accountable to it. No perceived or manufactured emergency can override or suspend the U.S. Constitution or the Peoples' protected rights under the constitution.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct.1683, 1687 (1974) states that “The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." In Ex parte Young, 209 U. S. 123 (1908), under the color of state law, when an officer acts to contravene the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is, in that case, stripped of his official or representative character, and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." CONSEQUENTLY WE DEMAND THAT DR. ROBERT LEVIN BE HELD PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR HIS ACTIONS AND REMOVED FROM OFFICE IMMEDIATELY.

If the Ventura County Public Health Department supports his plans to isolate and quarantine people forcibly, then the deciding officials are also in violation of the Federal and State constitution and case law previously mentioned. This behavior is an egregious violation of the Bill of Rights and constitutional law; and is in violation of the Peoples' rights (deprivation of rights under color of law). See 42 USC Sec. 1983, 1985, 1986.

Likewise those supporting Dr. Levin will also need to be removed from office due to his overt suggestion of violations of the Hobbs Act. Extortion of the Peoples' "property". Our rights are "property", and cannot be extorted by threats or use of force. See 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides, a conviction for extortion within the meaning of the Hobbs Act requires that the Defendants obtained “property” or “liberty” from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, or fear, or under color of official right, done "under color of official right".

Further Dr. Levin's has perjured and or breached his sworn oath of office in violation to the United States Constitution and in doing so violated 18 U.S.C. § 1951 relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion; and, further engaged in a Conspiracy to Racketeer in violation of section 1951 of section 1961 and 1962(d).

For purposes of this section, description of “under color of official right”, the Supreme Court held that the "under color of official right" prong of the Hobbs Act could be used to prosecute political corruption as long as there was a quid pro quo. See McCormick v. United States, 500 U.S. 257 (1991). See also United States v. Giles, 246 F.3d 966 (7th Cir. 2001) (holding that the quid pro quo requirement of McCormick applies outside the campaign contribution context); Peter D. Hardy, The Emerging Role of the Quid Pro Quo Requirement in Public Corruption Prosecutions Under the Hobbs Act, 28 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 409 (1995). In Evans v. United States (1992), the Court held that no affirmative act of inducement is required on the part of the public official.

Dr. Levin's actions so far constitute a violation of one or more of the prohibited overt acts under 18 U.S.C. §1961 (Racketeering) and 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (Conspiracy to racketeer). Please be so advised that a “R.I.C.O.” enterprise may include. United States v. Clark, 646 F.2d1259 (8th Cir. 1981), holding that a governmental agency can be a RICO enterprise, and listed several, including examples: the office of county judge to be an enterprise under the “RICO” Act and any other government agencies or offices; United States v. Altomare, 625 F.2d 5, 7, n.7 (4th Cir. 1980), the office of county prosecutor; United States v. Grzywacz, 603 F.2d 682, 686 (7th Cir.1979), the city police department.

I and many others call on you to publicly denounce Dr. Levin’s remarks and any plans to test and quarantine the people of Ventura County or to track those who have been in contact with them. This should be followed by his immediate resignation and or termination.

I accept your oath of office by Federal and State laws. Kindly inform me of your intent within 14 days regarding this notice to immediate remove Dr. Levin from office. I look forward to your response, and more importantly, your public denunciation of these draconian plans, including all unlawful "contract tracing" and all measures which violate Constitutional rights.

Sincerely,
[Your name & mailing address]

» EMBED THIS ACTION ON YOUR WEBSITE

This helps us reach critical mass sooner, and drives traffic to your site. Copy-paste this: