">
Vote against H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446
As one who gets updates from Gun Owners of America, I want you to know that I oppose H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446.
For starters, H.R. 8 would require Brady Checks through dealers -- and 4473’s -- on virtually every private firearms transaction in the country. In other words, Universal Background REGISTRATION Checks
Even the Obama-Biden Administration recognized this in 2013, when a leaked memo from the Justice Department revealed its assessment of Universal Background Checks: “Effectiveness depends on the ability to reduce straw purchasing, requiring GUN REGISTRATION.” (emphasis added).
Also, please oppose this bill -- and H.R. 1446, which would greatly increase the amount of time it could take for someone to actually take home a purchased firearm.
Neither bill will prevent real bad guys from getting firearms. In fact, this legislation will only be used to criminalize otherwise innocent activity by honest Americans. I urge you to oppose both bills.
GOA is scoring H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446
Gun Owners of America is scoring votes in favor of H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446 as anti-gun votes.
H.R. 8 would require virtually everyone “transferring” a firearm, either temporarily or permanently to complete a NICS check. There are limited exceptions, but they are trap doors, set up to fool law-abiding gun owners trying to do the right thing.
So if a person gives a gun to their son in exchange for work around the house and yard -- but he doesn’t get the government’s permission -- under H.R. 8, that person would be a criminal. So would the son.
If a person hands a gun to their neighbor to look at -- and then goes into the other room -- he or she is a felon. So is the neighbor.
If an elderly gun owner hears a noise downstairs in the middle of the night, and hands a gun to a son-in-law, both would be criminals if the noise turns out to be a stray dog.
It’s been clear for a long time that Pelosi and her fellow Leftists want to abolish the private ownership of firearms.
If they can make the law so fraught with technicalities, they can make gun ownership technically illegal.
Also, please oppose H.R. 1446, which would greatly increase the amount of time it could take for someone to actually take home a purchased firearm.
Even Obama admitted Universal Background Checks require registration
As one who gets updates from Gun Owners of America, I want you to know that I oppose H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446.
For starters, H.R. 8 would require Brady Checks through dealers -- and 4473’s -- on virtually every private firearms transaction in the country. In other words, Universal Background REGISTRATION Checks
Even the Obama-Biden Administration recognized this in 2013, when a leaked memo from the Justice Department revealed its assessment of Universal Background Checks: “Effectiveness depends on the ability to reduce straw purchasing, requiring GUN REGISTRATION.” (emphasis added).
Also, please oppose this bill -- and H.R. 1446, which would greatly increase the amount of time it could take for someone to actually take home a purchased firearm.
Neither bill will prevent real bad guys from getting firearms. In fact, this legislation will only be used to criminalize otherwise innocent activity by honest Americans. I urge you to oppose both bills.
Gun Control will send people to jail for otherwise innocent actions
Gun Owners of America is scoring votes in favor of H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446 as anti-gun votes.
H.R. 8 would require virtually everyone “transferring” a firearm, either temporarily or permanently to complete a NICS check. There are limited exceptions, but they are trap doors, set up to fool law-abiding gun owners trying to do the right thing.
So if a person gives a gun to their son in exchange for work around the house and yard -- but he doesn’t get the government’s permission -- under H.R. 8, that person would be a criminal. So would the son.
If a person hands a gun to their neighbor to look at -- and then goes into the other room -- he or she is a felon. So is the neighbor.
If an elderly gun owner hears a noise downstairs in the middle of the night, and hands a gun to a son-in-law, both would be criminals if the noise turns out to be a stray dog.
It’s been clear for a long time that Pelosi and her fellow Leftists want to abolish the private ownership of firearms.
If they can make the law so fraught with technicalities, they can make gun ownership technically illegal.
Also, please oppose H.R. 1446, which would greatly increase the amount of time it could take for someone to actually take home a purchased firearm.
Don’t even attempt to clean up bad bills like H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446
Do not support efforts to “clean up” H.R. 8 (which is gun owner registration) and H.R. 1446 (which will allow lengthy waiting period delays).
Regarding H.R. 1446, there has been a lot said about the so-called “Charleston loophole.” But the real loophole is the fact that Americans are prohibited from carrying guns in certain places -- or places that are known as “gun-free zones.”
The Charleston killer originally wanted to target a college, but he was dissuaded by the armed security that was there. So what did he do? He targeted a church, which was a gun-free zone.
This is the real “Charleston loophole” that needs to be eliminated. Congress should eliminate every gun free zone it can -- especially given that over 90% of mass shooters target these disarmament zones.
Gun Owners of America will keep me informed on these bills and on how every Representative votes.
The real “Charleston loophole” is the Gun-Free Zones where mass shootings occur
Do not support efforts to “clean up” H.R. 8 (which is gun owner registration) and H.R. 1446 (which will allow lengthy waiting period delays).
Regarding H.R. 1446, there has been a lot said about the so-called “Charleston loophole.” But the real loophole is the fact that Americans are prohibited from carrying guns in certain places -- or places that are known as “gun-free zones.”
The Charleston killer originally wanted to target a college, but he was dissuaded by the armed security that was there. So what did he do? He targeted a church, which was a gun-free zone.
This is the real “Charleston loophole” that needs to be eliminated. Congress should eliminate every gun free zone it can -- especially given that over 90% of mass shooters target these disarmament zones.
Gun Owners of America will keep me informed on these bills and on how every Representative votes.
Over 90% of mass shootings occur in Gun-Free Zones
Do not support efforts to “clean up” H.R. 8 (which is gun owner registration) and H.R. 1446 (which will allow lengthy waiting period delays).
Regarding H.R. 1446, there has been a lot said about the so-called “Charleston loophole.” But the real loophole is the fact that Americans are prohibited from carrying guns in certain places -- or places that are known as “gun-free zones.”
The Charleston killer originally wanted to target a college, but he was dissuaded by the armed security that was there. So what did he do? He targeted a church, which was a gun-free zone.
This is the real “Charleston loophole” that needs to be eliminated. Congress should eliminate every gun free zone it can -- especially given that over 90% of mass shooters target these disarmament zones.
Gun Owners of America will keep me informed on these bills and on how every Representative votes.
Biden’s AG will not prevent indefinite delays for gun purchases
Did you see what Biden’s nominee for Attorney General said?
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked Merrick Garland whether the FBI can indefinitely delay firearms purchases.
How did Garland answer to this VERY important question? Astonishingly, Garland said that he had “no opinion”!!!
This is outrageous. Please oppose H.R. 1446, which would greatly increase the amount of time it could take for someone to actually take home a purchased firearm.
And, please vote against H.R. 8, which would criminalize every transfer of a firearm unless it first goes through a government screening process -- aka, gun owner registration -- or unless the transfer fulfills one of the very few exemptions in the legislation.
Gun Owners of America tells me that because “transfer” is not defined, even handing a gun to a neighbor could be severely punished.
Again, please vote against H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446.
Garland is anti-gun, pure and simple
Joe Biden's pick for Attorney General is very anti-gun, pure and simple.
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked Garland whether the FBI can indefinitely delay firearms purchases.
How did Biden’s nominee for Attorney General answer to this VERY important question? Astonishingly, Garland said that he had “no opinion”!!!
In addition to this, Garland has supported bans on commonly-owned firearms, and he won’t promise to keep his DOJ from trying to overturn the Heller decision.
At his Judiciary Committee hearing, he said, “I can’t promise [that I won’t argue for overturning Heller].” (Emphasis added.) And he said, “I think the president is entitled to pursue [a ban on commonly-owned firearms].” That is wrong. All gun controls constitute unconstitutional infringements.
Merrick Garland is anti-gun, pure and simple. And Gun Owners of America will be scoring this vote.
Please vote NO on the Garland nomination.
Did you see Garland’s answer to Cotton’s question?
Did you see what Biden’s nominee for Attorney General said?
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked Merrick Garland whether the FBI can indefinitely delay firearms purchases.
How did Biden’s nominee for Attorney General answer to this VERY important question? Astonishingly, Garland said that he had “no opinion”!!!
In addition to this, Garland has supported bans on commonly-owned firearms, and he won’t promise to keep his DOJ from trying to overturn the Heller decision.
At his Judiciary Committee hearing, he said, “I can’t promise [that I won’t argue for overturning Heller].” (Emphasis added.) And he said, “I think the president is entitled to pursue [a ban on commonly-owned firearms].” That is wrong. All gun controls constitute unconstitutional infringements.
Merrick Garland is anti-gun, pure and simple. And Gun Owners of America will be scoring this vote.
Please vote NO on the Garland nomination.
Garland said he “can’t promise” he’ll abide by the Heller case
I hope that you will oppose Joe Biden’s nominee for Attorney General.
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked Merrick Garland whether the FBI can indefinitely delay firearms purchases.
How did Biden’s nominee for Attorney General answer to this VERY important question? Astonishingly, Garland said that he had “no opinion”!!!
In addition to this, Garland has supported bans on commonly-owned firearms, and he won’t promise to keep his DOJ from trying to overturn the Heller decision.
At his Judiciary Committee hearing, he said, “I can’t promise [that I won’t argue for overturning Heller].” (Emphasis added.) And he said, “I think the president is entitled to pursue [a ban on commonly-owned firearms].” That is wrong. All gun controls constitute unconstitutional infringements.
Merrick Garland is anti-gun, pure and simple. And Gun Owners of America will be scoring this vote.
Please vote NO on the Garland nomination.
Please oppose Garland for Attorney General
Please oppose Merrick Garland for Attorney General.
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked Garland whether the FBI can indefinitely delay firearms purchases.
How did Biden’s nominee for Attorney General answer to this VERY important question? Astonishingly, Garland said that he had “no opinion”!!!
In addition to this, Garland has supported bans on commonly-owned firearms, and he won’t promise to keep his DOJ from trying to overturn the Heller decision.
At his Judiciary Committee hearing, he said, “I can’t promise [that I won’t argue for overturning Heller].” (Emphasis added.) And he said, “I think the president is entitled to pursue [a ban on commonly-owned firearms].” That is wrong. All gun controls constitute unconstitutional infringements.
Merrick Garland is anti-gun, pure and simple. And Gun Owners of America will be scoring this vote.
Please vote NO on the Garland nomination.
GOA will score the vote on Merrick Garland
I hope that you received GOA's letter which states their strong opposition to Merrick Garland for Attorney General.
Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked Garland whether the FBI can indefinitely delay firearms purchases.
How did Biden’s nominee for Attorney General answer to this VERY important question? Astonishingly, Garland said that he had “no opinion”!!!
In addition to this, Garland has supported bans on commonly-owned firearms, and he won’t promise to keep his DOJ from trying to overturn the Heller decision.
At his Judiciary Committee hearing, he said, “I can’t promise [that I won’t argue for overturning Heller].” (Emphasis added.) And he said, “I think the president is entitled to pursue [a ban on commonly-owned firearms].” That is wrong. All gun controls constitute unconstitutional infringements.
Merrick Garland is anti-gun, pure and simple. And Gun Owners of America will be scoring this vote.
Please vote NO on the Garland nomination.