Previously, coronavirus trials failed in animals. When animal trials were skipped in 1960, infants post vaccination got sicker when exposed to wild virus, including 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization. The clinical trial recently failed in this age group. Pfizer wants their disastrous mRNA shot added to the official schedule for children so that they can have liability protection forever.  The Pfizer mRNA shot in children 2- to 4-years old failed in the clinical trial.  “Vaccine maker Pfizer said Friday that trials of its vaccine in children ages 2 to 5 show that it did not provide the expected immunity in kids this age, and it is adding a third dose to the regimen.” The safety signals are not clear without long term studies and years of substantial safety trials. Acting FDA Commissioner, Janet Woodcock, following orders from the Biden administration essentially said, ‘don’t worry about the fact that the shot does not work, we’ve got a drug to sell, submit an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application anyway.’  So Tuesday, Feb. 1, Pfizer submitted an EUA application for children six-months to four-years old. Pfizer and the FDA are proposing to start with two shots in this age group even though that approach has already failed and then they will add a third dose later in the spring if data comes in that supports that use. The plan is literally — give the kids the shot first, get the data later. This approach is completely unprecedented in the history of the FDA and it must be stopped.  As parents, doctors, grandparents, vaccinated and unvaccinated, we plead with you to not recklessly add an unstudied, unknown, dangerously new technology shot, on babies. This ABSOLUTELY must NOT happen! Every single one of you who plays a role in this decision needs to understand the message that: 1. We are watching;  2. The clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine failed in this age group; and  3. You must vote NO because this proposed use violates the prohibitions against illegal medical experiments as outlined in the Nuremberg Code.  For once, protect the vulnerable babies. This is the wrong choice to approve an experimental investigational shot for infants that has been available for only a few months. Sincerely, Your Name

In public testimony, Pediatrician Dr. Angelina Farella said, “Never in history before have we given medications that were not FDA approved to people who were not initially studied in the trial. There were no trial patients under the age 18. There were no trial patients previously had covid…I have given tens of thousands of vaccines in my office. At the recent ACIP meeting, one of the things that is extremely troubling, and it’s on their ACIP guidelines for the Pfizer vaccine in particular, is that recommendations about safety and efficacy and adverse events will come out AFTER authorization.” “We are currently allowing children to get this vaccine, and they were never studied in the clinical trial. On top of that…they are extrapolating the data from adults down to children and adolescents…Children are not little adults. This is unacceptable. Children have a 99.997% survivability.” After reviewing thousands of VAERS reports, Dr. Sahelian describes side effect details more thoroughly than most. His description and summary of the spike protein covid shot is also enlightening and informative. Giving readers the most comprehensive informed consent on risks and adverse reactions. This is a warning of what may happen to young infants who are unable to communicate harm and pain. You cannot approve a shot for babies with so much controversy, unknowns, and clear reports of serious side effects, and contaminated ingredients. (See 13. Pg. 20 DESCRIPTION of the FDA vaccine sheet). The Connecticut Department of Public Health months ago released ingredient (sm-102). SM-102 is an ingredient in the covid vaccine lipid nanoparticle mixture. The SM-102 product likely comes from Cayman Chemical, as their page lists it being used in lipid nanoparticle preparation and cites a publication by Moderna-affiliated authors. It's 10% SM-102 (ionizable lipid) and 90% chloroform (solvent). The Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for their product states it is an extremely toxic and hazardous substance (pg. 1, 2, 10), suspected of causing cancer, developmental toxicity, suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child, damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. The company states: "This product is not for human or veterinary use." We urge you to not give EUA approval for the covid shot. There is no safety data on co-administration of other vaccines. There aren’t any studies or data on the interaction of a new mRNA shot with the existing other shots. Dr. Schroeder and his team from Stanford suggested that pediatric hospitalization rates are used as a marker of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease severity in children but may be inflated by the detection of mild or asymptomatic infection via universal screening. Do not approve this shot for babies. Sincerely, Your Name

Previously, coronavirus trials failed in animals. When animal trials were skipped in 1960, infants post vaccination got sicker when exposed to wild virus, including 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization. According to CDC data on death or hospitalizations from or with COVID19, the disease has minimal risk for infants and young toddlers. Based on population by age and COVID19 data by age, it would not be worth any risk of adverse reaction to administer a COVID19 vaccine to infants or young children because there is no benefit for infants or young children to receive it. It is clearly an issue of risk vs. benefit analysis. CDC Death= 0-17 = 770 18-29=5,476 30-39=16,067 40-49=38,432 50-64=165,438 65-74=201,292 75-84=225,060 www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#SexAndAge Hospitalizations= 0-4=3044 5-17=3981 18-49=8267 50-64=80451 65+=123,508 gis.cdc.gov/grasp/covidnet/covid19_5.html Do not authorize this product on babies an young children. It’s unnecessary and our youngest population’s safety cannot be 100% guaranteed. Sincerely,

We encourage and ask all decision makers to not approve, or emergency authorize the covid shot for babies. These products for the pediatric population come from manufacturers with such unpresented criminal history. Pfizer is known and convicted for previous criminal history and behavior specifically related to children. Do not ignore their patterns and history. This is a red flag and critical signal of warning. Regardless of the science, data, or any other measure, this alone is enough. Note the previous track record related to children, products, toxins, and safety issues. Pfizer, J&J, And Astrazeneca previous criminal history includes tens of billion in damages from other drugs such as Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and Opioids. Commonality in Pfizer suits: bringing products to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result. Pfizer is considered a serial felon.  Pfizer has the distinction of the biggest criminal payout in history. Their pattern and convictions include fraud, knowingly bringing harmful products to market, federal charges, billions in settlements, testing new drugs on children without parental consent, bribery settlements, improper payments, deliberately misleading about hazards and harm, fatalities unwarned, knowing dangerous side effects of (same as VIOXX,:Bextra, Celebrex), numerous product safety issues.   If you approve the covid shot for babies, there will be no settlements, lawsuits, or criminal proceedings when injuries or criminal activities occur. If there is foul play with their product in mass production to the entire pediatric population, they will have full indemnity, and all liability will be removed. Do not authorize or approve covid vaccine from any of these manufacturers especially on the pediatric population.  Previously, coronavirus trials failed in animals. When animal trials were skipped in 1960, infants post vaccination got sicker when exposed to wild virus, including 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization. Sincerely, Your Name

Dear FDA, I am writing to urge you to deny Pfizer BioNtech BNT162b2 Emergency Use Authorization for the pediatric population of 6 months to 5 years old. Clinical trials are still ongoing and the fatality of SARS CoV-2 infections continues to decline. The risks of these experimental vaccines clearly outweigh the benefits for our pediatric population, as I will outline below.   Operation Warp Speed has fast tracked these experimental inoculations under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization. We have been assured that the clinical trials and the vaccines are acutely monitored for safety. I submit that there is overwhelming evidence to not only immediately halt the proposed vaccinations for age groups 6 months-4 years of age, but to dispose of the BNT162b2 product altogether as it has increasingly become the causative agent of numerous adverse events.  How long does the FDA take to approve a drug? Historically, it takes approximately 10 years for a drug to be developed and approved for dispensing. The FDA’s EAU has allowed us to skip these important, time dependent steps. This crucial long term safety data collection is even more imperative for our youth. They take on the burden of all risk with no benefit otherwise. Phase 1 trials ask the question “Is the treatment safe?” A quick survey of VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System regulated by United States Health and Human Services can answer this question for BNT162b2 without a doubt. It is not 100% safe. How can you turn a blind eye to this data? Courtesy of the CDC’s data as of 1/28/2022, note DEATH is recorded as 4,763 out of total 339,556 events for Pfizer\BIONTECH results only. Per the WHO database, VigiAccess yields 3,155,004 events that were associated with BNT162b2 and COVID-19 vaccines, and 15,744 of these were deaths. Phase 2 then asks the question “does the treatment work?”  The FDA and CDC claim that BNT162b2 is ‘safe and effective’. However, the pediatric trials  will not be completed until May 2026.  There is simply not enough data and the study is not powered enough to support efficacy thus far. Also consider the fact that so few children contract symptomatic COVID or end up hospitalized FOR COVID (rather than WITH COVID), it is next to impossible to tease out an accurate answer.  A better question would be why do we need to vaccinate a population with a statistically zero chance of COVID death according to the CDC? Acknowledging the above data, and to now include the pivotal medRxiv pre-print study entitled: “The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses'' we are shown that these inoculations can not only cause death, but are capable of dampening our immune systems to the point of initiating both autoimmunity and acquired immune deficiency. The innate immune system is extremely powerful in our pediatric population. What will be the effects of this immune system dysregulation? It is your ethical duty to know the answers to these questions. We do not need any more proof that BNT162b2 is not 100% safe and effective for our children. It is your ethical responsibility to reject Pfizer’s application for Emergency Use Authorization of their COVID vaccine for 6 month to 5 year olds. The number of concerns regarding the use of this product in this age group are staggering. The risks clearly outweigh the benefits. Do not approve BNT162b2 for use in our future generations. Sincerely, Your Name

Previously, coronavirus trials failed in animals. When animal trials were skipped in 1960, infants post vaccination got sicker when exposed to wild virus, including 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization. The clinical trial recently failed in this age group. Pfizer wants their disastrous mRNA shot added to the official schedule for children so that they can have liability protection forever.  The Pfizer mRNA shot in children 2- to 4-years old failed in the clinical trial.  “Vaccine maker Pfizer said Friday that trials of its vaccine in children ages 2 to 5 show that it did not provide the expected immunity in kids this age, and it is adding a third dose to the regimen.” The safety signals are not clear without long term studies and years of substantial safety trials. Acting FDA Commissioner, Janet Woodcock, following orders from the Biden administration essentially said, ‘don’t worry about the fact that the shot does not work, we’ve got a drug to sell, submit an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application anyway.’  So Tuesday, Feb. 1, Pfizer submitted an EUA application for children six-months to four-years old. Pfizer and the FDA are proposing to start with two shots in this age group even though that approach has already failed and then they will add a third dose later in the spring if data comes in that supports that use. The plan is literally — give the kids the shot first, get the data later. This approach is completely unprecedented in the history of the FDA and it must be stopped.  As parents, doctors, grandparents, vaccinated and unvaccinated, we plead with you to not recklessly add an unstudied, unknown, dangerously new technology shot, on babies. This ABSOLUTELY must NOT happen! Every single one of you who plays a role in this decision needs to understand the message that: 1. We are watching;  2. The clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine failed in this age group; and  3. You must vote NO because this proposed use violates the prohibitions against illegal medical experiments as outlined in the Nuremberg Code.  For once, protect the vulnerable babies. This is the wrong choice to approve an experimental investigational shot for infants that has been available for only a few months. Sincerely, Your Name