The main arguments advocating for the passage of LD 227 will revolve around claims like "children will die/commit suicide" and "parents are abusive." Every single transgender activists and organization they quote from gets their "standards of care" from the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) From LD 227: "Section 9002.3..in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." WPATH is considered the leading global scientific and medical authority on “gender medicine,” and in recent decades, its Standards of Care have shaped the guidance, policies and practices of governments, medical associations, public health systems and private clinics across the world. On March 4th, a enormous cache of leaked files and videos reveal that the organization does not meet the standards of evidence-based medicine, and members frequently discuss improvising treatments as they go along. Members are fully aware that children and adolescents cannot comprehend the lifelong consequences of “gender-affirming care,” and in some cases, due to poor health literacy, neither can their parents. In the WPATH Files, members demonstrate a lack of consideration for long-term patient outcomes despite being aware of the debilitating and potentially fatal side effects of cross-sex hormones and other treatments. Messages in the files show that patients with severe mental health issues, such as schizophrenia and dissociative identity disorder, and other vulnerabilities such as homelessness, are being allowed to consent to hormonal and surgical interventions. Members dismiss concerns about these patients and characterize efforts to protect them as unnecessary “gatekeeping.” Files, videos, transcripts, and more can be viewed here: environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath-files You now have absolutely no excuse to pass LD 227. Every testimony you've heard supporting it was based on WPATH guidelines, and they all privately knew it was based on lies and pseudoscience. Vote ought not to pass when you get into your working session. You'll be glad you did when the entire transgender cult falls apart.

I am writing to bring to your attention some critical information regarding LD 227 and the reliance on guidelines from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). As you may be aware, LD 227 has been supported by arguments citing the potential harm to children and allegations of parental abuse, all backed by references to WPATH standards of care. "Section 9002.3..in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." However, recent revelations have cast serious doubts on the credibility of WPATH and the guidelines it provides. On March 4th, a significant leak exposed a multitude of files and videos indicating that WPATH does not meet the standards of evidence-based medicine. Members of WPATH have been shown to discuss improvising treatments without proper consideration for long-term patient outcomes, especially concerning the potentially fatal side effects of certain interventions. Of particular concern is the apparent lack of regard for the ability of children and adolescents to comprehend the lifelong consequences of "gender-affirming care," as well as the vulnerability of patients with severe mental health issues or other vulnerabilities. This raises serious ethical questions about the practices endorsed by WPATH and, by extension, LD 227. I urge you to thoroughly review the evidence presented in the leaked files and consider the implications for LD 227. Continuing to support this legislation based on guidelines from an organization with such serious credibility issues would be deeply concerning and potentially harmful to those it seeks to protect. For your convenience, I have included a link to the leaked files for your reference: environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath-files Thank you for your attention to this matter. Vote ought not to pass on LD 227. It is absolutely horrendous and based on lies.

I am writing to you today with urgent concerns regarding LD 227 and its reliance on guidelines from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). It has come to my attention that recent leaks have revealed troubling information about WPATH and its standards of care. The leaked files and videos suggest that WPATH does not meet the standards of evidence-based medicine, and members have been shown to discuss treatments without adequate consideration for long-term patient outcomes. Your bill LD 227 literally relies on WPATH: "Section 9002.3..in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." Of particular concern is the apparent disregard for the ability of children and adolescents to fully comprehend the lifelong consequences of "gender-affirming care," as well as the vulnerability of certain patients with severe mental health issues or other vulnerabilities. Given these revelations, I urge you to reconsider your support for LD 227, which relies heavily on guidelines from WPATH. Continuing to endorse legislation based on standards from an organization with such serious credibility issues would be deeply irresponsible and potentially harmful to those it seeks to protect. For your reference, I have provided a link to the leaked files: environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath-files Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that you will carefully consider the evidence presented and vote ought NOT to pass on LD 227.

It is truly shocking that a bill such as LD 227 is even considered. I am reaching out to you today to urge you to reevaluate your support for LD 227 in light of recent revelations regarding the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). LD 227 relies on WPATH right here: From LD 227: "Section 9002.3..in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." Recent leaks have exposed troubling information about WPATH and its standards of care. The leaked files and videos suggest that WPATH does not meet the standards of evidence-based medicine, and members have been shown to discuss treatments without proper consideration for long-term patient outcomes. Of particular concern is the apparent lack of regard for the ability of children and adolescents to fully comprehend the lifelong consequences of "gender-affirming care," as well as the vulnerability of certain patients with severe mental health issues or other vulnerabilities. Given these revelations, it is imperative that we reconsider our reliance on guidelines from WPATH in legislation such as LD 227. Continuing to support this legislation based on standards from an organization with such serious credibility issues would be horribly irresponsible and very harmful to children. For your ease of reference, I have provided a link to the leaked files: environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath-files Thank you for your attention to this matter. Vote ought NOT to pass on LD 227.

The primary arguments in favor of the enactment of LD 227 will likely focus on assertions such as "children will be at risk of harm/self-harm" and "parents are engaging in abusive behavior." The proponents of this legislation repeatedly reference guidance from the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) in support of their stance. In fact, LD 227 states here "Section 9002.3..in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." However, recent revelations on March 4th have brought to light a significant volume of leaked material, including files and videos, that cast doubt on the credibility and adherence to evidence-based practices within WPATH. These disclosures suggest that members within WPATH may not consistently uphold the standards of care expected within the medical community, frequently resorting to improvisational tactics in their treatment approaches. Furthermore, the leaked files indicate a concerning lack of consideration for the long-term consequences of "gender-affirming care," particularly with regard to minors who may not possess the capacity to fully understand the irreversible impacts of such interventions. There are also indications that individuals with significant mental health issues or other vulnerabilities are being subjected to hormonal and surgical treatments with insufficient regard for their well-being or potential risks. For more detailed information regarding these revelations, including files, videos, transcripts, and additional materials, please refer to the following link: environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath. In light of these unsettling revelations, it is imperative to reevaluate the support for LD 227, given the reliance on flawed and potentially harmful guidance from WPATH. It is advisable to exercise caution in considering any endorsements based on this now-questionable source and to proceed with caution in light of this new information. Don't fall for the emotional blackmail. Vote ought NOT to pass on LD 227.

The primary points advocating for the passing of LD 227 are likely to be centered on claims such as "children's lives are at risk" and "parents are engaging in abusive behavior." It seems that all references made by transgender activists and organizations in their lobbying efforts draw from the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) and its “standards of care.” WPATH has been widely recognized as the leading global authority on “gender medicine,” with its Standards of Care playing a significant role in shaping policies and practices worldwide. However, recent leaks on March 4th have exposed the organization's failure to uphold evidence-based medicine standards. Members have been shown to discuss making treatment decisions on the fly and demonstrate a lack of concern for the long-term well-being of patients, particularly children and adolescents, who may not fully comprehend the implications of gender-affirming interventions. Section 9002.3 from LD 227 relies on WPATH: "...in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care, including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." Moreover, the leaked documents reveal that vulnerable individuals with serious mental health conditions or other challenges are being rushed into irreversible medical interventions without adequate safeguards. WPATH members have shown a dismissive attitude towards concerns for these patients, labeling attempts to protect them as unnecessary obstacles. For an in-depth look at the leaked WPATH files, including files, videos, and transcripts, visit environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath. This revelation leaves no room for doubt that LD 227 should not be passed based on misrepresented facts and pseudoscience present in the testimonies supporting it. When it comes time to vote on the bill during the working session, the evidence indicates that a decision to oppose it would be the right course of action. By doing so, the decision-makers can ensure they are not inadvertently supporting unreliable standards and the potential harm that may result from them.

The primary arguments in favor of pushing through LD 227 will center on alarming assertions such as "children facing death or suicide" and accusations of parental abuse within the transgender community. Advocates consistently cite guidance from the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) as the cornerstone of their stance on gender-affirming care standards. It is critical to note that WPATH has long been regarded as the authoritative body in the field of "gender medicine," with its Standards of Care influencing policies and practices worldwide. However, recent leaks on March 4th have unveiled a significant volume of files and videos, suggesting that WPATH falls short of ensuring evidence-based care. Members appear to engage in unstructured treatment approaches, acknowledging that minors often lack the capacity to grasp the lifelong implications of gender-affirming interventions, as do their guardians in some instances. LD 227 itself relies on WPATH as stated in "Section 9002.3..in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." The leaked WPATH materials raise serious concerns regarding the lack of emphasis on long-term patient well-being and the potential grave consequences of treatments like cross-sex hormones. Reports indicate a dismissive attitude towards at-risk individuals, including those grappling with severe mental health conditions or precarious living situations, allowing them to undergo invasive procedures without sufficient safeguards. For a comprehensive view of the leaked WPATH files, videos, and related content, please visit: environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath Given the revelations stemming from these disclosures, proponents of LD 227 should reevaluate their position, considering the disconcerting revelations about the organization they have relied upon for guidance. It is incumbent upon decision-makers to exercise prudence and discernment during the upcoming deliberations on the bill. You are opening up yourself and Maine to serious implications given this new information. VOTE OUGHT NOT TO PASS ON LD 227!

The primary arguments put forth in favor of LD 227 will likely be centered around emotional blackmail claims such as "children will die" and "parents are dangerous and harmful." It is noteworthy that every reference to the "standards of care" in the legislation is linked to the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH). In fact, LD 227 relies on the same WPATH: "Section 9002.3..in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." WPATH is recognized as a key worldwide authority in the realm of "gender medicine," and its Standards of Care have significantly influenced the policies and practices of various medical bodies, public health institutions, and clinics globally. However, on March 4th, a substantial volume of leaked documents and videos raised serious concerns about WPATH's adherence to evidence-based medical practices. These disclosures indicate that WPATH members frequently discuss making treatment decisions in an ad hoc manner and show a disregard for the long-term consequences of gender-affirming interventions, especially in children and adolescents who may not fully comprehend the implications. Additionally, there are instances where patients with severe mental health conditions and vulnerabilities are undergoing potentially harmful treatments without adequate safeguards or considerations for their well-being. For access to these leaked videos, files, and additional evidence, please visit: environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath Given this significant information, it is clear that supporting LD 227 solely based on references to WPATH guidelines may not be prudent. It is essential to thoroughly review and consider the veracity and ethical implications of the data presented. Making an informed decision to vote against the passage of LD 227 during deliberations is crucial to ensuring the long term safety and well-being of all involved. Vote ought NOT to pass on this awful LD 227 bill.

The primary arguments in favor of enacting LD 227 are largely centered around alarming claims such as the possibility of harm to children and concerns about parental abuse. Proponents frequently cite references from transgender activists and organizations that adhere to the standards set forth by the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH). Your LD 227 itself states: "Section 9002.3..in accordance with the accepted standard of care as defined by major medical professional organizations and agencies with expertise in the field of gender-affirming care including in the Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8 or subsequent version, published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health." However, recent revelations casting doubt on the credibility of WPATH have come to light. Leaked files and videos suggest that the organization may not uphold evidence-based medical practices, and discussions among members indicate a tendency to improvise treatments without full consideration of long-term consequences. It appears that some patients, including vulnerable individuals with severe mental health issues and limited understanding of the potential risks, are being allowed to consent to medical interventions with significant implications. For access to the leaked files, videos, transcripts, and further details, please visit environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath. Given this concerning information, it is clear that the reliance on WPATH guidelines, on which many testimonies supporting LD 227 are based, may not be grounded in scientific rigor as previously thought. When it comes time to make a decision on the passage of LD 227, voting against it may be advisable to avoid contributing to potential harm and perpetuating misinformation. It is crucial to consider all available evidence and make informed choices that prioritize the well-being and safety of children involved. Vote ought NOT to pass on LD 227.