I strongly urge you to oppose Casey Means' nomination as Surgeon General in order to actualize the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) goal. Dr. Means, who is no longer a licensed physician, is a strong advocate of invasive Biometric Surveillance, which is antithetical to our rights and freedoms, but entirely consistent with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). The position of Surgeon General must be held by a physician who understands, and is firmly committed to, Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy. Dr. Means meets none of these requirements and by her commercial and professional activities demonstrates that she is completely unqualified for the post of Surgeon General. After quitting her Residency, Dr. Means founded, and currently owns, two companies whose products and services promote invasive Biomedical Surveillance. Means is the co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of "Levels", selling subcutaneous continuous glucose monitors and is also involved in her brother's company, “Truemed”, selling biometric tracking devices, supplements, and fitness equipment online. Her enthusiasm for invasive Biometric Surveillance and her participation in their popularization alone should disqualify her to lead, or participate in, our national Public Health efforts. Her lack of clinical experience and the blurring of lines between medical care and marketing are further indications of her established poor judgement and conflicts of interest. The book that she co-authored, “Good Energy”, misrepresents the premises, principles and practices of the otherwise valuable health approach known as “Functional Medicine”, further signalling her unsuitability for the post of Surgeon General. I urge you to protect Americans’ rights, privacy and health by rejecting Dr. Means’ ill-conceived and dangerous nomination for the important post of America's Surgeon General.

I strongly encourage you to stand against the appointment of Casey Means as Surgeon General to ensure the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative is achieved. Dr. Means, who no longer holds a valid medical license, actively endorses invasive Biometric Surveillance, a practice that directly threatens our rights and freedoms while aligning with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). The role of Surgeon General demands a physician who champions Informed Consent, respects personal privacy, and upholds bodily autonomy - requirements Dr. Means fails to meet. Her professional endeavors, including ownership of companies promoting intrusive Biomedical Surveillance technology, clearly render her unqualified for such a crucial public health position. Leaving her Residency to establish two companies focused on invasive Biometric Surveillance is troubling. Dr. Means serves as the Chief Medical Officer of "Levels," which markets continuous glucose monitors, and is associated with "Truemed," her brother's venture selling biometric tracking devices and health products. Her zealous advocacy for these surveillance practices alone should disqualify her from leading national health initiatives. Coupled with her limited clinical experience, blurred boundaries between medical care and commerce, and misleading representations of health practices in her co-authored book "Good Energy," it is evident that Dr. Means lacks the sound judgement and ethics required for the role of Surgeon General. It is imperative to defend Americans' rights, privacy, and well-being by rejecting Dr. Casey Means' unsuitable and risky nomination for the esteemed position of Surgeon General.

I strongly advise against supporting Casey Means as a candidate for Surgeon General to uphold the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative. Dr. Means, who is no longer practicing as a licensed physician, actively promotes invasive Biometric Surveillance, which goes against our fundamental rights and aligns more with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). The Surgeon General position should be held by a physician who values Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy - none of which Dr. Means exhibits. Her professional pursuits, including ownership of companies advocating Biomedical Surveillance technology, demonstrate her lack of qualifications for this crucial health leadership role. It is concerning that she pushes for invasive surveillance methods and blurs the boundaries between medical care and commercial activities. Her co-authored book, “Good Energy”, distorts the essence of Functional Medicine, indicating a concerning pattern of misrepresentation and conflicts of interest. The nomination of Dr. Means for Surgeon General poses a threat to Americans' rights, privacy, and overall well-being. It is essential to reject her nomination in order to safeguard public health in the United States.

I strongly urge you to oppose the nomination of Casey Means as Surgeon General to uphold the goal of prioritizing and improving the health of our nation. Dr. Means, who is no longer a practicing physician, has shown support for invasive Biometric Surveillance, which goes against our fundamental rights and values. This aligns with a broader global agenda that does not serve the interests of the American people. The role of Surgeon General should be filled by an individual who respects Informed Consent, values personal privacy, and upholds bodily autonomy. Dr. Means does not demonstrate these qualities and her involvement in commercial ventures raises serious concerns about her suitability for this vital position. Following her departure from her medical residency, Dr. Means has established and currently operates two companies that promote invasive Biomedical Surveillance. Her connections to these enterprises, including "Levels" and "Truemed", raise significant ethical red flags. Her advocacy for practices that compromise privacy and her blurred boundaries between healthcare and commerce undermine her credibility to spearhead national public health initiatives. Given her lack of clinical experience and her questionable affiliations, Dr. Means is ill-equipped to lead our country's health efforts. Her involvement in misleading health publications further casts doubt on her judgment and qualifications to serve as Surgeon General. I implore you to safeguard the rights, privacy, and well-being of Americans by opposing Dr. Means' nomination for Surgeon General.

I strongly recommend opposing the nomination of Dr. Casey Means for Surgeon General to uphold the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) objective. Dr. Means, no longer a licensed physician, advocates for invasive Biometric Surveillance, which is contrary to our fundamental rights but aligns with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). The Surgeon General role requires a physician who values Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy - qualities Dr. Means lacks. Her leadership and professional pursuits in promoting invasive Biomedical Surveillance through her companies raise significant concerns about her qualifications. Departing her Residency, Dr. Means established two companies promoting invasive Biomedical Surveillance products. As the co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of "Levels" and involved in "Truemed", her endorsement of biometric tracking devices and supplements raises doubts about her suitability to oversee national Public Health initiatives. Dr. Means' limited clinical experience and entanglement of medical care with marketing activities demonstrate her questionable judgement and conflicts of interest. Additionally, her co-authored book, “Good Energy”, misrepresents the principles of “Functional Medicine”, further highlighting her inadequacy for the Surgeon General position. It is imperative to safeguard Americans' rights, privacy, and health by opposing Dr. Means' nomination, which poses risks to public health and well-being in the country.

It is essential to voice your opposition to the nomination of Casey Means for Surgeon General in order to uphold the goal of prioritizing America's health. Dr. Means, who no longer holds a medical license, has shown strong support for invasive Biometric Surveillance, a practice that goes against our fundamental rights and liberties while aligning with a larger globalist agenda. The Surgeon General role requires a physician who values Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy - qualities that Dr. Means clearly lacks. Having abandoned her Residency, Dr. Means has ventured into the business world by establishing two companies that promote invasive Biomedical Surveillance. Her involvement with "Levels" and "Truemed" in selling biometric tracking devices raises serious concerns about her suitability to lead our nation's Public Health initiatives. Dr. Means' limited clinical experience and the intertwining of medical care with commercial ventures only showcase her lack of judgement and questionable conflicts of interest. The publication of her co-authored book, “Good Energy”, which distorts the principles of “Functional Medicine”, adds to the existing doubts about her professional background. It is evident that Dr. Means is ill-equipped and unqualified to take on the crucial role of Surgeon General. I urge you to stand up for the rights, privacy, and well-being of all Americans by rejecting Dr. Means' nomination for Surgeon General.

I strongly encourage you to oppose the nomination of Casey Means as Surgeon General to advance the goal of prioritizing public health and well-being in America. Dr. Means, a former physician with controversial views on invasive Biometric Surveillance, does not align with the principles of informed consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy that are crucial for someone in the position of Surgeon General. Her commercial ventures in promoting such surveillance technologies raise serious concerns about her ability to uphold these fundamental values. Having abandoned her medical residency, Dr. Means has focused on promoting biometric tracking devices and invasive health monitoring through her companies, "Levels" and "Truemed". Her lack of clinical experience, as well as her blurred boundaries between medical practice and commercial interests, make her unfit for the important role of Surgeon General. It is imperative to prioritize the well-being and rights of Americans by rejecting Dr. Means' nomination and selecting a candidate who will truly champion public health and safety.

It is of utmost importance that we oppose the nomination of Casey Means for the position of Surgeon General to uphold the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) goal. Dr. Means, who is no longer a licensed physician, has been a vocal advocate of invasive Biometric Surveillance, a practice that goes against our fundamental rights and liberties, yet aligns with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). The role of Surgeon General demands someone who values Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy - qualities which Dr. Means clearly lacks. Her current commercial ventures and professional pursuits indicate a clear lack of qualifications for such a crucial position. Following her departure from Residency, Dr. Means has been actively involved in two companies that promote Biomedical Surveillance. Through her roles at "Levels" and "Truemed," where she sells monitoring devices and fitness-related products, Dr. Means prioritizes invasive surveillance over individuals' rights to privacy and autonomy. Dr. Means' support for intrusive surveillance practices and her involvement in their commercialization alone disqualify her from leading our national Public Health endeavors. Coupled with her minimal clinical experience and the mingling of medical care with marketing, it is evident that Dr. Means does not possess the acumen required for the role of Surgeon General. Furthermore, her contributions to the misinterpretation of Functional Medicine practices in her book "Good Energy" only highlight her unsuitability for this esteemed position. It is imperative that we safeguard the rights, privacy, and well-being of Americans by opposing Dr. Means' nomination for Surgeon General, a decision that could potentially undermine our nation's public health efforts.

I strongly advise you to oppose Dr. Casey Means' nomination for Surgeon General, as it goes against the objectives of achieving the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) mission. Dr. Means, who is no longer practicing medicine, actively promotes invasive Biometric Surveillance, which aligns with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda rather than protecting our rights and freedoms. The role of Surgeon General should be fulfilled by a physician who upholds principles such as Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy. Unfortunately, Dr. Means does not meet these essential criteria and her involvement in commercial ventures makes her wholly unsuitable for the position. Having left her medical Residency, Dr. Means now owns two companies that endorse invasive Biomedical Surveillance practices. She serves as the Chief Medical Officer of "Levels", which sells continuous glucose monitors, and is also associated with "Truemed", a company offering biometric tracking devices, supplements, and fitness equipment online. Dr. Means' advocacy for invasive surveillance technologies, along with her questionable business engagements, should automatically disqualify her from spearheading national Public Health initiatives. Her lack of clinical expertise, as well as the evident conflicts of interest and judgment concerns due to her commercial activities, further underlines her incompetence for the role of Surgeon General. The fact that Dr. Means co-authored a book that distorts the principles of Functional Medicine also adds to the reasons why her nomination should be opposed. It is crucial to safeguard Americans' rights, privacy, and overall well-being by rejecting Dr. Means' potentially detrimental nomination for the esteemed position of Surgeon General.

I encourage you to oppose the appointment of Casey Means as Surgeon General to uphold the imperative of advancing public health in America. Dr. Means, lacking an active medical license, advocates for invasive Biometric Surveillance, a stance contrary to our fundamental rights and indicative of alignment with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda. The crucial role of Surgeon General demands a practitioner who upholds values such as Informed Consent, privacy, and bodily autonomy - qualities which Dr. Means does not exhibit. Following her exit from Residency, Dr. Means founded and currently operates two companies promoting Biomedical Surveillance products. As the co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of "Levels", she markets continuous glucose monitors and has ties to "Truemed", a platform selling biometric tracking devices, supplements, and fitness equipment. Her advocacy for invasive surveillance technologies and active role in their proliferation should be reason enough to disqualify her from contributing to national public health initiatives. Furthermore, Dr. Means' lack of clinical experience, intertwining of medical care with commercial interests, and misrepresentation of health approaches in her co-authored book "Good Energy", underscore her unsuitability for the position of Surgeon General. In the interest of preserving Americans' rights, privacy, and well-being, it is vital to oppose the misguided and perilous nomination of Dr. Casey Means for the esteemed role of Surgeon General.

I strongly advise against supporting the nomination of Casey Means for the position of Surgeon General, as it goes against our goal of ensuring a healthy America through the MAHA initiative. Dr. Means, who is no longer practicing as a licensed physician, has shown support for invasive Biometric Surveillance, a practice that conflicts with our fundamental rights and aligns with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). Our Surgeon General should be a physician who upholds values such as Informed Consent, individual privacy, and bodily autonomy, none of which Dr. Means appears to demonstrate. Her current professional ventures do not align with the responsibilities of the Surgeon General role, further highlighting her lack of qualification for the position. Following her decision to leave her Residency, Dr. Means founded and runs two companies that promote Biomedical Surveillance products and services. Her involvement in these ventures raises concerns about her ability to prioritize public health over commercial interests, as well as her judgment in ethical matters. Her co-authorship of "Good Energy" misrepresents principles of Functional Medicine, signaling a potential lack of credibility to lead our national public health efforts as Surgeon General. For the protection of Americans' rights, privacy, and well-being, I strongly recommend opposing Dr. Means' nomination as Surgeon General of the United States.

I strongly recommend opposing the nomination of Casey Means for Surgeon General in order to uphold the integrity of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative. Dr. Means, despite no longer holding an active medical license, is a vocal proponent of invasive Biometric Surveillance, a stance that directly contradicts our fundamental rights and liberties, aligning more with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). The role of Surgeon General should be filled by a physician who champions Informed Consent, respects personal privacy, and upholds bodily autonomy - qualities Dr. Means unfortunately does not possess. Her past and present commercial ventures show a clear bias towards invasive surveillance technologies, making her thoroughly unsuitable for the position of Surgeon General. Upon abandoning her medical Residency, Dr. Means went on to establish and operate two companies that profit from promoting invasive Biomedical Surveillance. As the co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of "Levels", where subcutaneous continuous glucose monitors are sold, and through her involvement with "Truemed", which specializes in biometric tracking devices and other health-related products, Dr. Means has actively contributed to the normalization of intrusive surveillance practices. This alone should disqualify her from leading our nation's Public Health initiatives. Her lack of clinical expertise and the intertwining of medical care with commercial interests only serve to raise concerns about her judgement and potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, Dr. Means' co-authored book, "Good Energy", misleadingly represents the principles of Functional Medicine, further highlighting her lack of qualification for the crucial role of Surgeon General. It is imperative to safeguard the rights, privacy, and well-being of the American public by rejecting Dr. Means' unfit and hazardous nomination for the pivotal role of America's Surgeon General.

I strongly urge you to oppose the nomination of Casey Means as Surgeon General to uphold the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) goal. Dr. Means, no longer a licensed physician, supports invasive Biometric Surveillance, which contradicts our rights and aligns more with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). The Surgeon General position should be held by a physician who values Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy. Dr. Means does not meet these standards and her commercial ventures demonstrate her unsuitability for this crucial role. Her involvement in products promoting invasive Biomedical Surveillance, such as continuous glucose monitors, and her lack of clinical experience raise concerns about her ability to lead national Public Health efforts. Your rejection of Dr. Means' nomination will safeguard the rights, privacy, and health of Americans.

I strongly encourage you to oppose the appointment of Dr. Casey Means as Surgeon General, as her support for invasive Biometric Surveillance contradicts the goal of advancing the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative. It is concerning that Dr. Means is no longer practicing as a licensed physician and advocates for intrusive methods of monitoring individuals, which threatens the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens. Given her affiliation with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030) and lack of commitment to Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy, she is clearly unsuitable for the role of Surgeon General. Dr. Means' commercial interests in companies promoting biometric surveillance technologies raise serious ethical concerns and highlight her lack of qualification to lead our nation's public health efforts. Her professional background and associations indicate a disregard for medical ethics and a conflict of interest that should disqualify her from consideration. In the interest of safeguarding the rights, privacy, and well-being of all Americans, it is crucial to reject Dr. Means' nomination and appoint a candidate who upholds the values of integrity, patient care, and public health advocacy essential for the position of Surgeon General.

I strongly advise you to consider opposing the nomination of Dr. Casey Means for Surgeon General as it goes against the goal of Make America Healthy Again (MAHA). Dr. Means, who is no longer a licensed physician, supports invasive Biometric Surveillance which poses a threat to our rights and freedoms. This aligns with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030) rather than prioritizing Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy. With her background in commercial ventures promoting Biomedical Surveillance, Dr. Means lacks the necessary qualifications and understanding required for the crucial position of Surgeon General. It is concerning that Dr. Means' involvement in companies such as "Levels" and "Truemed" showcase her focus on invasive surveillance tools, thus making her unfit to oversee national Public Health efforts. Additionally, her lack of clinical experience and conflicts of interest raise doubts about her judgment and ability to lead in matters concerning public health. In order to safeguard the rights, privacy, and health of Americans, it is essential to reject Dr. Means' nomination for the role of Surgeon General.

I strongly advise against supporting the appointment of Casey Means as Surgeon General, as this would contradict the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative. Dr. Means, a former physician without a valid license, is an outspoken proponent of invasive Biometric Surveillance, which conflicts with our fundamental rights and aligns closely with the globalist Biodigital Convergence agenda (Agenda 2030). The Surgeon General role requires a medical professional who upholds the values of Informed Consent, personal privacy, and bodily autonomy - qualities that Dr. Means lacks. Her current business activities and advocacy for invasive surveillance technologies make her glaringly unsuitable for a position that demands an understanding of and respect for individual rights. Having abandoned her Residency, Dr. Means has founded and manages two companies that promote intrusive Biomedical Surveillance. Her involvement with "Levels", a company selling subcutaneous continuous glucose monitors, and "Truemed", which offers biometric tracking devices and fitness products, reveals a concerning focus on these invasive technologies. Such a predisposition disqualifies her from a position leading our national Public Health efforts. It is evident that Dr. Means' clinical inexperience, questionable business practices, and blurred professional boundaries make her a risky choice for the crucial role of Surgeon General. I implore decision-makers to prioritize the protection of Americans' rights, privacy, and well-being by opposing Dr. Means' nomination as Surgeon General.