Thank you for your consideration of the misgivings that I, and many others, share regarding the risks pertaining to the deployment of 5G technology. I understand there may be some benefit from this technology. I also understand, however, that there are very significant risks which have not been addressed to date. As my elected representative, I urge you to examine then take immediate action to mitigate these risks. What are the risks and negative impacts from 5G? These fit into the following broad categories: 1) adverse health impacts, 2) privacy impacts, 3) national security risks and 4) budgetary impacts. ADVERSE HEALTH IMPACTS have been confirmed in over 3,600 medical studies that include cancer, sterility, heart conditions, exacerbation of other underlying conditions and much more including environmental impacts. PRIVACY IMPACTS include the harvesting of personal data about citizens without their knowledge or consent. 5G facilitates granular "contact tracing" surveillance. The "business case" for 5G right now is surveillance devices and cameras, not data service for consumers. NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS include providing hostile nations with access to sensitive military and critical infrastructure networks. BUDGETARY IMPACTS rise from lawsuits against municipal authorities for failure to comply with current statutory protections such as those provided in the ADA and FHA and tort liability for personal injuries caused by exposure from wireless infrastructure on public right-of-way. Individually, these risks would merit further action. Collectively, they should justify treating the matter as a high priority. States such as Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Oregon, New York, and California have taken action to limit and exert more control over the 5G rollout. See Burlington's Small Cell Policy, which is being used as a model in municipalities throughout the U.S. www.burlington.org/town_government/small_cell_information.php Furthermore, 23 municipalities from around the U.S are currently suing in the federal 9th District Court for the rights to regulate and control the rollout of 5G infrastructure in their local communities. Federal legislators including Senators Richard Blumenthal and James Gaughran; and Representatives Anna Eshoo, Thomas Suozzi, Dan Lipinski, Andy Kim, and Peter DeFazio have all formally initiated an inquiry regarding the safety of 5G technology and have requested documentation of its safety. To be clear, to date there are no independent safety studies demonstrating the safety of prolonged exposure to the microwave and millimeter-wave frequencies; or phased array beamforming intended to be used for 5G in the future. Thus, with thousands of studies indicating harmful bio-effect(s) from wireless radiation, and since the wireless industry tells us that 5G requires installation of transmitters emitting wireless radiation 24 hours a day in front of every 3-10 homes, causing or facilitating the deployment of 5G and then exposing individuals against their will violates their right to bodily integrity and is a battery tort. The emissions crossing private land are a nuisance. Countries and cities around the world, including Switzerland, Brussels, Italy, Greece, UK, Slovenia, Nigeria, New Guinea, have completely halted or postponed the roll out of 5G until its safety has been firmly established. Leading tech and industry professionals including Frank Clegg, the former President of Microsoft Canada, have made pragmatic appeals to policy makers regarding the risks of 5G technologies (see: youtu.be/xSP2exnmJXg ). Mr. Clegg has requested that his industry, the telecommunications industry, be required by policy makers to do full safety testing on 5G and pursue technological options such as fiber optics which mitigate health, privacy and security risks. WHAT ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN? Contrary to what you may be told by federal authorities or perhaps even your own legal counsel, there are significant actions you can take right now to protect the rights of the citizens in your state. At the state level, we urge you to introduce and pass legislation which: 1) protects from federal encroachment of traditional state police powers, and 2) provides your local communities with increased oversight authority for 5G deployments and require telecom service providers to submit evidence of their robust compliance with FCC emission guidelines prior to activation of 5G infrastructure components. Since local siting authorities are being tied up, please act to remove any such barriers and support communities’ ability to protect themselves. For more information, please see “5G & Wireless Facts at a Glance”: solutionsforhumanity.net/wireless-facts-at-a-glance/ This is one of those rare policy issues that defies traditional party lines. Elected officials spanning the political spectrum have found common ground on a matter of utmost importance to all Americans. I strongly urge you to take legislative action that protects us all.

Thank you for your consideration of the misgivings that I, and many others, share regarding the risks pertaining to the deployment of 5G technology. I understand there may be some benefit from this technology. I also understand, however, that there are very significant risks which have not been addressed to date. As my elected representative, I urge you to examine then take immediate action to mitigate these risks. What are the risks and negative impacts from 5G? These fit into the following broad categories: 1) adverse health impacts, 2) privacy impacts, 3) national security risks and 4) budgetary impacts. ADVERSE HEALTH IMPACTS have been confirmed in over 3,600 medical studies that include cancer, sterility, heart conditions, exacerbation of other underlying conditions and much more including environmental impacts. PRIVACY IMPACTS include the harvesting of personal data about citizens without their knowledge or consent. 5G facilitates granular "contact tracing" surveillance. The "business case" for 5G right now is surveillance devices and cameras, not data service for consumers. NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS include providing hostile nations with access to sensitive military and critical infrastructure networks. BUDGETARY IMPACTS rise from lawsuits against municipal authorities for failure to comply with current statutory protections such as those provided in the ADA and FHA and tort liability for personal injuries caused by exposure from wireless infrastructure on public right-of-way. Individually, these risks would merit further action. Collectively, they should justify treating the matter as a high priority. States such as Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Oregon, New York, and California have taken action to limit and exert more control over the 5G rollout. See Burlington's Small Cell Policy, which is being used as a model in municipalities throughout the U.S. www.burlington.org/town_government/small_cell_information.php Furthermore, 23 municipalities from around the U.S are currently suing in the federal 9th District Court for the rights to regulate and control the rollout of 5G infrastructure in their local communities. Federal legislators including Senators Richard Blumenthal and James Gaughran; and Representatives Anna Eshoo, Thomas Suozzi, Dan Lipinski, Andy Kim, and Peter DeFazio have all formally initiated an inquiry regarding the safety of 5G technology and have requested documentation of its safety. To be clear, to date there are no independent safety studies demonstrating the safety of prolonged exposure to the microwave and millimeter-wave frequencies; or phased array beamforming intended to be used for 5G in the future. Thus, with thousands of studies indicating harmful bio-effect(s) from wireless radiation, and since the wireless industry tells us that 5G requires installation of transmitters emitting wireless radiation 24 hours a day in front of every 3-10 homes, causing or facilitating the deployment of 5G and then exposing individuals against their will violates their right to bodily integrity and is a battery tort. The emissions crossing private land are a nuisance. Countries and cities around the world, including Switzerland, Brussels, Italy, Greece, UK, Slovenia, Nigeria, New Guinea, have completely halted or postponed the roll out of 5G until its safety has been firmly established. Leading tech and industry professionals including Frank Clegg, the former President of Microsoft Canada, have made pragmatic appeals to policy makers regarding the risks of 5G technologies (see: youtu.be/xSP2exnmJXg ). Mr. Clegg has requested that his industry, the telecommunications industry, be required by policy makers to do full safety testing on 5G and pursue technological options such as fiber optics which mitigate health, privacy and security risks. WHAT ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN? Contrary to what you may be told by federal authorities or perhaps even your own legal counsel, there are significant actions you can take right now to protect the rights of the citizens in your state. At the state level, we urge you to introduce and pass legislation which: 1) protects from federal encroachment of traditional state police powers, and 2) provides your local communities with increased oversight authority for 5G deployments and require telecom service providers to submit evidence of their robust compliance with FCC emission guidelines prior to activation of 5G infrastructure components. Since local siting authorities are being tied up, please act to remove any such barriers and support communities’ ability to protect themselves. For more information, please see “5G & Wireless Facts at a Glance”: solutionsforhumanity.net/wireless-facts-at-a-glance/ This is one of those rare policy issues that defies traditional party lines. Elected officials spanning the political spectrum have found common ground on a matter of utmost importance to all Americans. I strongly urge you to take legislative action that protects us all.

Thank you for your consideration of the misgivings that I, and many others, share regarding the risks pertaining to the deployment of 5G technology. I understand there may be some benefit from this technology. I also understand, however, that there are very significant risks which have not been addressed to date. As my elected representative, I urge you to examine then take immediate action to mitigate these risks. What are the risks and negative impacts from 5G? These fit into the following broad categories: 1) adverse health impacts, 2) privacy impacts, 3) national security risks and 4) budgetary impacts. ADVERSE HEALTH IMPACTS have been confirmed in over 3,600 medical studies that include cancer, sterility, heart conditions, exacerbation of other underlying conditions and much more including environmental impacts. PRIVACY IMPACTS include the harvesting of personal data about citizens without their knowledge or consent. 5G facilitates granular "contact tracing" surveillance. The "business case" for 5G right now is surveillance devices and cameras, not data service for consumers. NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS include providing hostile nations with access to sensitive military and critical infrastructure networks. BUDGETARY IMPACTS rise from lawsuits against municipal authorities for failure to comply with current statutory protections such as those provided in the ADA and FHA and tort liability for personal injuries caused by exposure from wireless infrastructure on public right-of-way. Individually, these risks would merit further action. Collectively, they should justify treating the matter as a high priority. States such as Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Oregon, New York, and California have taken action to limit and exert more control over the 5G rollout. See Burlington's Small Cell Policy, which is being used as a model in municipalities throughout the U.S. www.burlington.org/town_government/small_cell_information.php Furthermore, 23 municipalities from around the U.S are currently suing in the federal 9th District Court for the rights to regulate and control the rollout of 5G infrastructure in their local communities. Federal legislators including Senators Richard Blumenthal and James Gaughran; and Representatives Anna Eshoo, Thomas Suozzi, Dan Lipinski, Andy Kim, and Peter DeFazio have all formally initiated an inquiry regarding the safety of 5G technology and have requested documentation of its safety. To be clear, to date there are no independent safety studies demonstrating the safety of prolonged exposure to the microwave and millimeter-wave frequencies; or phased array beamforming intended to be used for 5G in the future. Thus, with thousands of studies indicating harmful bio-effect(s) from wireless radiation, and since the wireless industry tells us that 5G requires installation of transmitters emitting wireless radiation 24 hours a day in front of every 3-10 homes, causing or facilitating the deployment of 5G and then exposing individuals against their will violates their right to bodily integrity and is a battery tort. The emissions crossing private land are a nuisance. Countries and cities around the world, including Switzerland, Brussels, Italy, Greece, UK, Slovenia, Nigeria, New Guinea, have completely halted or postponed the roll out of 5G until its safety has been firmly established. Leading tech and industry professionals including Frank Clegg, the former President of Microsoft Canada, have made pragmatic appeals to policy makers regarding the risks of 5G technologies (see: youtu.be/xSP2exnmJXg ). Mr. Clegg has requested that his industry, the telecommunications industry, be required by policy makers to do full safety testing on 5G and pursue technological options such as fiber optics which mitigate health, privacy and security risks. WHAT ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN? Contrary to what you may be told by federal authorities or perhaps even your own legal counsel, there are significant actions you can take right now to protect the rights of the citizens in your state. At the state level, we urge you to introduce and pass legislation which: 1) protects from federal encroachment of traditional state police powers, and 2) provides your local communities with increased oversight authority for 5G deployments and require telecom service providers to submit evidence of their robust compliance with FCC emission guidelines prior to activation of 5G infrastructure components. Since local siting authorities are being tied up, please act to remove any such barriers and support communities’ ability to protect themselves. For more information, please see “5G & Wireless Facts at a Glance”: solutionsforhumanity.net/wireless-facts-at-a-glance/ This is one of those rare policy issues that defies traditional party lines. Elected officials spanning the political spectrum have found common ground on a matter of utmost importance to all Americans. I strongly urge you to take legislative action that protects us all.

Thank you for your consideration of the misgivings that I, and many others, share regarding the risks pertaining to the deployment of 5G technology. I understand there may be some benefit from this technology. I also understand, however, that there are very significant risks which have not been addressed to date. As my elected representative, I urge you to examine then take immediate action to mitigate these risks. What are the risks and negative impacts from 5G? These fit into the following broad categories: 1) adverse health impacts, 2) privacy impacts, 3) national security risks and 4) budgetary impacts. ADVERSE HEALTH IMPACTS have been confirmed in over 3,600 medical studies that include cancer, sterility, heart conditions, exacerbation of other underlying conditions and much more including environmental impacts. PRIVACY IMPACTS include the harvesting of personal data about citizens without their knowledge or consent. 5G facilitates granular "contact tracing" surveillance. The "business case" for 5G right now is surveillance devices and cameras, not data service for consumers. NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS include providing hostile nations with access to sensitive military and critical infrastructure networks. BUDGETARY IMPACTS rise from lawsuits against municipal authorities for failure to comply with current statutory protections such as those provided in the ADA and FHA and tort liability for personal injuries caused by exposure from wireless infrastructure on public right-of-way. Individually, these risks would merit further action. Collectively, they should justify treating the matter as a high priority. States such as Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Oregon, New York, and California have taken action to limit and exert more control over the 5G rollout. See Burlington's Small Cell Policy, which is being used as a model in municipalities throughout the U.S. www.burlington.org/town_government/small_cell_information.php Furthermore, 23 municipalities from around the U.S are currently suing in the federal 9th District Court for the rights to regulate and control the rollout of 5G infrastructure in their local communities. Federal legislators including Senators Richard Blumenthal and James Gaughran; and Representatives Anna Eshoo, Thomas Suozzi, Dan Lipinski, Andy Kim, and Peter DeFazio have all formally initiated an inquiry regarding the safety of 5G technology and have requested documentation of its safety. To be clear, to date there are no independent safety studies demonstrating the safety of prolonged exposure to the microwave and millimeter-wave frequencies; or phased array beamforming intended to be used for 5G in the future. Thus, with thousands of studies indicating harmful bio-effect(s) from wireless radiation, and since the wireless industry tells us that 5G requires installation of transmitters emitting wireless radiation 24 hours a day in front of every 3-10 homes, causing or facilitating the deployment of 5G and then exposing individuals against their will violates their right to bodily integrity and is a battery tort. The emissions crossing private land are a nuisance. Countries and cities around the world, including Switzerland, Brussels, Italy, Greece, UK, Slovenia, Nigeria, New Guinea, have completely halted or postponed the roll out of 5G until its safety has been firmly established. Leading tech and industry professionals including Frank Clegg, the former President of Microsoft Canada, have made pragmatic appeals to policy makers regarding the risks of 5G technologies (see: youtu.be/xSP2exnmJXg ). Mr. Clegg has requested that his industry, the telecommunications industry, be required by policy makers to do full safety testing on 5G and pursue technological options such as fiber optics which mitigate health, privacy and security risks. WHAT ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN? Contrary to what you may be told by federal authorities or perhaps even your own legal counsel, there are significant actions you can take right now to protect the rights of the citizens in your state. At the state level, we urge you to introduce and pass legislation which: 1) protects from federal encroachment of traditional state police powers, and 2) provides your local communities with increased oversight authority for 5G deployments and require telecom service providers to submit evidence of their robust compliance with FCC emission guidelines prior to activation of 5G infrastructure components. Since local siting authorities are being tied up, please act to remove any such barriers and support communities’ ability to protect themselves. For more information, please see “5G & Wireless Facts at a Glance”: solutionsforhumanity.net/wireless-facts-at-a-glance/ This is one of those rare policy issues that defies traditional party lines. Elected officials spanning the political spectrum have found common ground on a matter of utmost importance to all Americans. I strongly urge you to take legislative action that protects us all.

Thank you for your consideration of the misgivings that I, and many others, share regarding the risks pertaining to the deployment of 5G technology. I understand there may be some benefit from this technology. I also understand, however, that there are very significant risks which have not been addressed to date. As my elected representative, I urge you to examine then take immediate action to mitigate these risks. What are the risks and negative impacts from 5G? These fit into the following broad categories: 1) adverse health impacts, 2) privacy impacts, 3) national security risks and 4) budgetary impacts. ADVERSE HEALTH IMPACTS have been confirmed in over 3,600 medical studies that include cancer, sterility, heart conditions, exacerbation of other underlying conditions and much more including environmental impacts. PRIVACY IMPACTS include the harvesting of personal data about citizens without their knowledge or consent. 5G facilitates granular "contact tracing" surveillance. The "business case" for 5G right now is surveillance devices and cameras, not data service for consumers. NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS include providing hostile nations with access to sensitive military and critical infrastructure networks. BUDGETARY IMPACTS rise from lawsuits against municipal authorities for failure to comply with current statutory protections such as those provided in the ADA and FHA and tort liability for personal injuries caused by exposure from wireless infrastructure on public right-of-way. Individually, these risks would merit further action. Collectively, they should justify treating the matter as a high priority. States such as Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Oregon, New York, and California have taken action to limit and exert more control over the 5G rollout. See Burlington's Small Cell Policy, which is being used as a model in municipalities throughout the U.S. www.burlington.org/town_government/small_cell_information.php Furthermore, 23 municipalities from around the U.S are currently suing in the federal 9th District Court for the rights to regulate and control the rollout of 5G infrastructure in their local communities. Federal legislators including Senators Richard Blumenthal and James Gaughran; and Representatives Anna Eshoo, Thomas Suozzi, Dan Lipinski, Andy Kim, and Peter DeFazio have all formally initiated an inquiry regarding the safety of 5G technology and have requested documentation of its safety. To be clear, to date there are no independent safety studies demonstrating the safety of prolonged exposure to the microwave and millimeter-wave frequencies; or phased array beamforming intended to be used for 5G in the future. Thus, with thousands of studies indicating harmful bio-effect(s) from wireless radiation, and since the wireless industry tells us that 5G requires installation of transmitters emitting wireless radiation 24 hours a day in front of every 3-10 homes, causing or facilitating the deployment of 5G and then exposing individuals against their will violates their right to bodily integrity and is a battery tort. The emissions crossing private land are a nuisance. Countries and cities around the world, including Switzerland, Brussels, Italy, Greece, UK, Slovenia, Nigeria, New Guinea, have completely halted or postponed the roll out of 5G until its safety has been firmly established. Leading tech and industry professionals including Frank Clegg, the former President of Microsoft Canada, have made pragmatic appeals to policy makers regarding the risks of 5G technologies (see: youtu.be/xSP2exnmJXg ). Mr. Clegg has requested that his industry, the telecommunications industry, be required by policy makers to do full safety testing on 5G and pursue technological options such as fiber optics which mitigate health, privacy and security risks. WHAT ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN? Contrary to what you may be told by federal authorities or perhaps even your own legal counsel, there are significant actions you can take right now to protect the rights of the citizens in your state. At the state level, we urge you to introduce and pass legislation which: 1) protects from federal encroachment of traditional state police powers, and 2) provides your local communities with increased oversight authority for 5G deployments and require telecom service providers to submit evidence of their robust compliance with FCC emission guidelines prior to activation of 5G infrastructure components. Since local siting authorities are being tied up, please act to remove any such barriers and support communities’ ability to protect themselves. For more information, please see “5G & Wireless Facts at a Glance”: solutionsforhumanity.net/wireless-facts-at-a-glance/ This is one of those rare policy issues that defies traditional party lines. Elected officials spanning the political spectrum have found common ground on a matter of utmost importance to all Americans. I strongly urge you to take legislative action that protects us all.

Thank you for your consideration of the misgivings that I, and many others, share regarding the risks pertaining to the deployment of 5G technology. I understand there may be some benefit from this technology. I also understand, however, that there are very significant risks which have not been addressed to date. As my elected representative, I urge you to examine then take immediate action to mitigate these risks. What are the risks and negative impacts from 5G? These fit into the following broad categories: 1) adverse health impacts, 2) privacy impacts, 3) national security risks and 4) budgetary impacts. ADVERSE HEALTH IMPACTS have been confirmed in over 3,600 medical studies that include cancer, sterility, heart conditions, exacerbation of other underlying conditions and much more including environmental impacts. PRIVACY IMPACTS include the harvesting of personal data about citizens without their knowledge or consent. 5G facilitates granular "contact tracing" surveillance. The "business case" for 5G right now is surveillance devices and cameras, not data service for consumers. NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS include providing hostile nations with access to sensitive military and critical infrastructure networks. BUDGETARY IMPACTS rise from lawsuits against municipal authorities for failure to comply with current statutory protections such as those provided in the ADA and FHA and tort liability for personal injuries caused by exposure from wireless infrastructure on public right-of-way. Individually, these risks would merit further action. Collectively, they should justify treating the matter as a high priority. States such as Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Oregon, New York, and California have taken action to limit and exert more control over the 5G rollout. See Burlington's Small Cell Policy, which is being used as a model in municipalities throughout the U.S. www.burlington.org/town_government/small_cell_information.php Furthermore, 23 municipalities from around the U.S are currently suing in the federal 9th District Court for the rights to regulate and control the rollout of 5G infrastructure in their local communities. Federal legislators including Senators Richard Blumenthal and James Gaughran; and Representatives Anna Eshoo, Thomas Suozzi, Dan Lipinski, Andy Kim, and Peter DeFazio have all formally initiated an inquiry regarding the safety of 5G technology and have requested documentation of its safety. To be clear, to date there are no independent safety studies demonstrating the safety of prolonged exposure to the microwave and millimeter-wave frequencies; or phased array beamforming intended to be used for 5G in the future. Thus, with thousands of studies indicating harmful bio-effect(s) from wireless radiation, and since the wireless industry tells us that 5G requires installation of transmitters emitting wireless radiation 24 hours a day in front of every 3-10 homes, causing or facilitating the deployment of 5G and then exposing individuals against their will violates their right to bodily integrity and is a battery tort. The emissions crossing private land are a nuisance. Countries and cities around the world, including Switzerland, Brussels, Italy, Greece, UK, Slovenia, Nigeria, New Guinea, have completely halted or postponed the roll out of 5G until its safety has been firmly established. Leading tech and industry professionals including Frank Clegg, the former President of Microsoft Canada, have made pragmatic appeals to policy makers regarding the risks of 5G technologies (see: youtu.be/xSP2exnmJXg ). Mr. Clegg has requested that his industry, the telecommunications industry, be required by policy makers to do full safety testing on 5G and pursue technological options such as fiber optics which mitigate health, privacy and security risks. WHAT ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN? Contrary to what you may be told by federal authorities or perhaps even your own legal counsel, there are significant actions you can take right now to protect the rights of the citizens in your state. At the state level, we urge you to introduce and pass legislation which: 1) protects from federal encroachment of traditional state police powers, and 2) provides your local communities with increased oversight authority for 5G deployments and require telecom service providers to submit evidence of their robust compliance with FCC emission guidelines prior to activation of 5G infrastructure components. Since local siting authorities are being tied up, please act to remove any such barriers and support communities’ ability to protect themselves. For more information, please see “5G & Wireless Facts at a Glance”: solutionsforhumanity.net/wireless-facts-at-a-glance/ This is one of those rare policy issues that defies traditional party lines. Elected officials spanning the political spectrum have found common ground on a matter of utmost importance to all Americans. I strongly urge you to take legislative action that protects us all.

Thank you for your consideration of the misgivings that I, and many others, share regarding the risks pertaining to the deployment of 5G technology. I understand there may be some benefit from this technology. I also understand, however, that there are very significant risks which have not been addressed to date. As my elected representative, I urge you to examine then take immediate action to mitigate these risks. What are the risks and negative impacts from 5G? These fit into the following broad categories: 1) adverse health impacts, 2) privacy impacts, 3) national security risks and 4) budgetary impacts. ADVERSE HEALTH IMPACTS have been confirmed in over 3,600 medical studies that include cancer, sterility, heart conditions, exacerbation of other underlying conditions and much more including environmental impacts. PRIVACY IMPACTS include the harvesting of personal data about citizens without their knowledge or consent. 5G facilitates granular "contact tracing" surveillance. The "business case" for 5G right now is surveillance devices and cameras, not data service for consumers. NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS include providing hostile nations with access to sensitive military and critical infrastructure networks. BUDGETARY IMPACTS rise from lawsuits against municipal authorities for failure to comply with current statutory protections such as those provided in the ADA and FHA and tort liability for personal injuries caused by exposure from wireless infrastructure on public right-of-way. Individually, these risks would merit further action. Collectively, they should justify treating the matter as a high priority. States such as Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Louisiana, Oregon, New York, and California have taken action to limit and exert more control over the 5G rollout. See Burlington's Small Cell Policy, which is being used as a model in municipalities throughout the U.S. www.burlington.org/town_government/small_cell_information.php Furthermore, 23 municipalities from around the U.S are currently suing in the federal 9th District Court for the rights to regulate and control the rollout of 5G infrastructure in their local communities. Federal legislators including Senators Richard Blumenthal and James Gaughran; and Representatives Anna Eshoo, Thomas Suozzi, Dan Lipinski, Andy Kim, and Peter DeFazio have all formally initiated an inquiry regarding the safety of 5G technology and have requested documentation of its safety. To be clear, to date there are no independent safety studies demonstrating the safety of prolonged exposure to the microwave and millimeter-wave frequencies; or phased array beamforming intended to be used for 5G in the future. Thus, with thousands of studies indicating harmful bio-effect(s) from wireless radiation, and since the wireless industry tells us that 5G requires installation of transmitters emitting wireless radiation 24 hours a day in front of every 3-10 homes, causing or facilitating the deployment of 5G and then exposing individuals against their will violates their right to bodily integrity and is a battery tort. The emissions crossing private land are a nuisance. Countries and cities around the world, including Switzerland, Brussels, Italy, Greece, UK, Slovenia, Nigeria, New Guinea, have completely halted or postponed the roll out of 5G until its safety has been firmly established. Leading tech and industry professionals including Frank Clegg, the former President of Microsoft Canada, have made pragmatic appeals to policy makers regarding the risks of 5G technologies (see: youtu.be/xSP2exnmJXg ). Mr. Clegg has requested that his industry, the telecommunications industry, be required by policy makers to do full safety testing on 5G and pursue technological options such as fiber optics which mitigate health, privacy and security risks. WHAT ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN? Contrary to what you may be told by federal authorities or perhaps even your own legal counsel, there are significant actions you can take right now to protect the rights of the citizens in your state. At the state level, we urge you to introduce and pass legislation which: 1) protects from federal encroachment of traditional state police powers, and 2) provides your local communities with increased oversight authority for 5G deployments and require telecom service providers to submit evidence of their robust compliance with FCC emission guidelines prior to activation of 5G infrastructure components. Since local siting authorities are being tied up, please act to remove any such barriers and support communities’ ability to protect themselves. For more information, please see “5G & Wireless Facts at a Glance”: solutionsforhumanity.net/wireless-facts-at-a-glance/ This is one of those rare policy issues that defies traditional party lines. Elected officials spanning the political spectrum have found common ground on a matter of utmost importance to all Americans. I strongly urge you to take legislative action that protects us all.